Summary
Quotation: Bryant RA, Bawaneh A, Awwad M, Al-Hayek H, Giardinelli L, Whitney C, et al. (2022) Effectiveness of a quick group behavioral intervention for frequent psychological problems in Syrian refugees in Jordan: A randomized managed trial. PLoS Med 19(3):
e1003949.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003949
Educational Editor: Sarah Murray, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg College of Public Well being, UNITED STATES
Acquired: April 1, 2021; Accepted: February 16, 2022; Revealed: March 17, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Bryant et al. That is an open entry article distributed underneath the phrases of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and copy in any medium, offered the unique creator and supply are credited.
Knowledge Availability: Deidentified information for re-analysis of the trial and meta-analyses can be found for obtain from Figshare at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_/16938718.
Funding: This mission was supported by the Nationwide Well being and Medical Analysis Council-European Union Collaborating Grant, grant quantity 1142605 (RAB) and European Union Horizon 2020 Analysis and Innovation intervention Societal Challenges Grant, grant quantity 733337 (MS, PC, RAB, MJD, PV). The funders had no position in research design, information assortment and evaluation, resolution to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing pursuits: The authors have declared that no competing pursuits exist.
Abbreviations:
APQ,
Alabama Parenting Questionnaire; EUC,
enhanced common care; gPM+,
Group Downside Administration Plus; HSCL,
Hopkins Symptom Guidelines; IMC,
Worldwide Medical Corps; K10,
Kessler Psychological Misery Scale; LMICs,
low- and middle-income nations; PGD,
extended grief dysfunction; PQ-B,
Prodromal Questionnaire-16; PSC,
Pediatric Signs Guidelines; PTSD,
posttraumatic stress dysfunction; RCT,
randomized managed trial; WHODAS,
WHO Incapacity Evaluation Schedule
Introduction
Worldwide, almost 80 million persons are forcibly displaced by battle and battle, with over 26 million formally registered refugees and plenty of extra who should not registered [1]. Individuals uncovered to this type of adversity are at better danger for frequent psychological problems, together with nervousness, despair, and posttraumatic stress dysfunction (PTSD) [2]. This isn’t stunning contemplating the publicity to violence, traumatic dying, compelled separation from household and social networks, poverty, and hardship that folks in these conditions endure. Refugees displaced from war-affected settings are sometimes hosted in straight adjoining low- and middle-income nations (LMICs) that lack ample assets to supply satisfactory psychological well being providers. The current Lancet Fee on world psychological well being highlighted the marked hole between psychological well being want and provision of providers in LMICs [3]. The foremost boundaries to offering evidence-based psychological well being packages in LMICs embrace the dearth of psychological well being specialists, most remedy packages being disorder-specific, which ends up in well being suppliers needing to grasp a number of packages, and prolonged packages which are expensive for well being providers and demanding on recipients [4].
In response to those challenges, a spread of task-shifting approaches has been developed by which nonspecialists are skilled and supervised to ship psychological well being packages. Meta-analyses point out that this method could be efficient [5–7]. The World Well being Group has developed one such program, Downside Administration Plus (PM+) [8] that could be a 5-session program that adopts a transdiagnostic method to scale back frequent psychological problems by educating abilities in arousal discount, problem-solving, behavioral activation, and accessing social help [9]. This program has been proven to be efficient in giant trials in each particular person (PM+) [10,11] and group (gPM+) [12] codecs in communities affected by adversity. One of many main challenges for advancing the generalizability of gPM+ to populations most affected by prior trauma and ongoing adversity is to find out its effectiveness in refugee camp settings by which individuals have vital restrictions on their actions, selections, and capability to exert management over their futures.
Central to the problem of worldwide psychological well being is the psychological well-being of youngsters. Though the efficacy of gPM+ and different task-shifting packages have been proven, there’s a shortage of efficient packages that handle the wants of youngsters [13]. This can be a significantly an pressing concern for refugee kids and youth, who symbolize greater than half of refugees on the planet immediately [1]. Many studies point out that refugee youth expertise excessive charges of psychological misery [14–16]. One potential means to enhance the psychological well-being of refugee youth is by enhancing the psychological well being of their dad and mom or caregivers [17,18]. There’s proof that refugees’ psychological well being is related to the psychological standing of their kids, and it seems this affiliation is partly attributed to their parenting conduct, which, in flip, impacts the psychological well-being of their kids [19–22]. For instance, one population-based research discovered that refugees’ PTSD severity was related to harsh parenting, which was, in flip, related to worse psychological issues of their kids [19]. This convergent proof raises the likelihood that lowering frequent psychological problems in refugees might enhance their parenting conduct, which can have a downstream useful impact on the psychological well being of their kids; this risk is supported by meta-analysis indicating that psychotherapy for depressed moms has useful results of their kids’s psychological well being [23].
To handle the numerous psychological well being wants of refugees, and significantly these in refugee camp settings, we carried out a randomized managed trial (RCT) of gPM+ to grownup Syrian refugees in a camp in Jordan and in contrast this program to enhanced common care (EUC). This trial targeted on refugees in a camp due to the restricted proof concerning scalable psychological packages for refugees in camps. Worldwide, roughly one-quarter of refugees reside in camps [24]. You will need to take a look at the capability of gPM+ in refugees who’re in camp settings as a result of there could be particular stressors in refugee camps, in addition to some limitations that will restrict the extent to which refugees can use the talents taught in gPM+. For instance, refugees in camps might have restricted motion, restricted employment alternatives, and separation from household that may compound psychological difficulties and hamper the extent to which downside administration methods could also be employed [25–27]. This trial additionally investigated the potential affect of gPM+ on refugees’ parenting conduct, and likewise how this may increasingly profit their kids’s psychological well being. It was hypothesized that gPM+ would scale back nervousness and despair, incapacity, posttraumatic stress, personally recognized issues, extended grief, prodromal psychotic signs, in addition to enhancing parenting behaviors and youngsters’s psychological well being, relative to EUC on the follow-up evaluation.
Methodology
Examine design
This two-arm, single-blind RCT was carried out in Azraq Refugee Camp in Jordan. There are over 650,000 Syrian refugees registered with the UNHCR in Jordan; nonetheless, the federal government estimates there are greater than 1.4 million Syrians at the moment residing in Jordan [28]. Azraq Refugee Camp hosts roughly 36,000 Syrian refugees, of which 60% are youth. The research was carried out in collaboration with Worldwide Medical Corps (IMC) Jordan, who was the native implementer in Jordan. The mission was prospectively registered (Australian and New Zealand Scientific Trials Registry, no. 12619001386123) and ethically authorized by the Institutional Assessment Board on the King Hussein Most cancers Centre in Jordan and the College of New South Wales Human Analysis Ethics Committee. The trial protocol is offered in S1 Text and on-line [29]. This research is reported as per the Consolidated Requirements of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guideline (S1 Checklist).
Members
Members comprised refugees in Azraq Refugee Camp and inclusion standards have been as follows: (a) aged ≥18 years; (b) scores ≥16 on the Kessler Psychological Misery Scale (K10 [30]); (c) Arabic-speaking; (d) scores ≥17 on the WHO Incapacity Evaluation Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS [31]); and (e) had a baby or dependent residing within the family aged 10 to 16 years. The K10 is a 10-item questionnaire that assesses psychological misery, with a spread of 10 to 50; a cutoff of 16 has been proven to point psychological misery [32]. The Ok-10 has been validated in Syrian populations [26], and the really helpful cutoff of 16 has been efficiently utilized in refugee populations [33]. This measure was employed as a quick screener to allow fast screening of refugees with psychological misery. The WHODAS is a 12-item questionnaire that assesses normal functioning, with a potential whole rating of 48; following prior trials of gPM+ [10,11], a cutoff of 17 was used to determine purposeful impairment. Exclusion standards have been as follows: (a) vital cognitive or neurological impairment; (b) acute medical situations; (c) extreme psychological problems (e.g., psychotic or substance abuse problems); and (d) acute danger of suicide. Exclusion standards have been assessed by structured questions pertaining to every criterion described within the WHO PM+ guide [8]. Refugees assembly exclusion standards have been referred to specialised providers within the camp. Recruitment was carried out by Arabic-speaking assessors by way of door-to-door screening of consecutive caravans; to scale back contamination of the interventions, just one grownup per caravan was invited to take part within the research. It was thought of that there would probably not be vital contamination between neighboring caravans as a result of socialization didn’t adhere to caravan proximity. The invitation was initially prolonged to the one that answered the door, and in the event that they declined, the provide was made to a different grownup residing within the caravan. Knowledgeable consent concerned 2 steps: (1) consent to take part within the screening; and (2) members who screened constructive have been invited to supply their consent to take part within the trial. Members accomplished a written consent kind, and those that have been illiterate offered witnessed oral consent, in keeping with suggestions from WHO [34]. Moreover, caregivers have been requested to supply written consent for participation for one among their kids whom the caregiver nominated between the ages of 10 and 16 years to be assessed; moreover, verbal assent was obtained from the kid. Kids have been then approached to acquire assent to finish the Pediatric Signs Guidelines (PSC-35) [35] throughout the pre- and post-assessments; kids’s assent was not a requirement for participation of their caregiver.
Procedures
Previous to the trial, the interpretation and cultural adaptation of gPM+ was reviewed in adaptation workshops with Syrian representatives and native healthcare suppliers, and a pilot trial to find out logistic points that wanted to be addressed within the camp previous to the present trial [36]. The measures and intervention have been tailored for cultural appropriateness by way of language, metaphors, and context. The difference course of was carried out through free record interviews, key informant interviews, focus teams, and adaptation workshops; the total particulars of the difference procedures are described elsewhere [37].
The gPM+ program adopted the WHO group program [38]. The gPM+ intervention comprised 5 weekly 2-hour group periods (8 to 10 individuals per group that have been gender particular). Session 1 established group guidelines, psychoeducation, and a stress administration technique. Session 2 targeted on problem-solving methods. Session 3 offered directions in behavioral activation. Session 4 targeted on methods in accessing social helps. Lastly, Session 5 reviewed all methods and addressed relapse prevention choices. As well as, Classes 2 to 4 reviewed progress on beforehand taught methods. The main target within the group periods have been to show the members abilities in managing the stressors confronted within the camp, and group dialogue was facilitated to encourage group members to supply enter on problem-solving the frequent challenges that members skilled each day.
The teams have been carried out by 2 facilitators. The facilitators held a bachelor’s diploma in social sciences or a associated well being self-discipline, have been proficient in Arabic, however had no prior expertise in delivering psychosocial packages. The facilitators obtained 8 days of coaching within the supply of gPM+, in addition to fundamental counseling and group facilitation abilities. Following coaching, the gPM+ suppliers have been required to finish 2 observe teams, as a lead facilitator and as a cofacilitator, underneath shut supervision. As well as, an area supervisor (HAH) who labored throughout the camp offered weekly supervision all through the trial. The native supervisor additionally obtained fortnightly supervision by a main coach of gPM+ in Sydney, Australia (KD) through Skype calls. To guage remedy constancy, 20% of gPM+ periods have been attended by the supervisor, who used a guidelines to make sure that all gPM+ elements have been delivered. Every technique was checked by the supervisor as current/absent, and whether or not it was delivered satisfactorily or not. Constancy checks through recording of periods weren’t potential due to considerations from refugees that recorded data disclosed throughout periods could also be accessed by authorities or Syrian authorities and used in opposition to them or their households.
Members randomized to EUC obtained a go to to their caravan from IMC workers and given particular details about their providers within the camp that would help with the issues recognized within the evaluation. This data included organizations offering providers for psychological well being issues, in addition to well being, parenting, and vocational coaching. Classes have been roughly quarter-hour in period. If members in EUC displayed extreme psychiatric issues (e.g., psychosis or suicidality) throughout the suggestions periods that weren’t reported within the preliminary evaluation that required fast consideration, they have been referred to IMC psychological well being clinics within the camp for additional intervention. If danger of hurt was decided, members have been referred to the Nationwide Centre for Psychological Well being in Amman.
Outcomes
The first consequence was the full rating for nervousness and despair, respectively, measured with the Hopkins Symptom Guidelines-25 (HSCL-25) [39]. The HSCL consists of 25 questions which are rated on a 4-point scale (1 = by no means, 4 = extraordinarily), with increased whole scores reflecting extra extreme nervousness and despair. The HSCL has been validated throughout many cultures, together with in Arabic contexts [40]; really helpful cutoffs for possible caseness of tension and despair on the Arabic model of the HSCL relative to structured scientific interview is 2.0 and a pair of.1, respectively [40]. The interior consistency of the HSCL within the present pattern was sturdy for the nervousness (0.79) and despair (0.84) scales, respectively.
Secondary outcomes have been purposeful impairment, PTSD signs, personally recognized issues, extended grief signs, prodromal psychotic signs, parenting conduct, and youngsters’s self-reported psychological well being. Purposeful impairment was assessed utilizing the 12-item WHODAS 2.0, with every merchandise scored of 4-point scale and better scores indicating extra extreme incapacity. The WHODAS has good psychometric properties throughout many nations [31], and the inner consistency within the present research was 0.82. PTSD signs have been measured utilizing the PCL-5 [41], which is a 20-item guidelines corresponding with the 20 DSM-5 PTSD signs. Gadgets are rated on a 5-point scale, with increased scores indicating extra extreme PTSD. A validity research of Syrian and Iraqi refugees noticed {that a} rating of 23 is the optimum cutoff to point possible PTSD prognosis [42]. Personally recognized issues have been assessed with the Psychological Final result Profiles (PSYCHLOPS) [43], which handle 3 domains (principal issues skilled, 2 questions), functioning (1 query), and well-being (1 query). Every response is scored on a 6-point scale, with a potential whole rating of 20 on which increased scores point out better downside severity. The PSYCHLOPS has been validated repeatedly in world psychological well being [44,45] and has been proven to be delicate to alter in prior PM+ and gPM+ trials [10–12]. Extended grief signs have been assessed utilizing the PG-13 [46], which is a 13-item self-report measure that indexes the core signs of extended grief dysfunction (PGD); in present research, the inner consistency was 0.86. Eleven gadgets are rated on a 5-point scale and a pair of gadgets on a 2-item scale, offering a potential whole rating of 57 with increased rating reflecting extra extreme grief. Prodromal psychotic signs have been assessed utilizing the Prodromal Questionnaire-16 (PQ-B [47]). The PQ-B includes 16 true or false gadgets about early indicators of psychosis and asks about ranges of misery skilled for the endorsed gadgets on a 4-point scale; increased scores point out worse prodromal signs. Respondents who endorse ≥6 gadgets are thought of to be in danger for growing psychosis [47]; the inner consistency was 0.82. Parenting conduct was assessed utilizing the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire-42 (APQ) [48]. The APQ measures 5 main parenting constructs: (i) involvement (10 gadgets); (ii) poor supervision and monitoring (10 gadgets); (iii) constructive parenting (6 gadgets); (iv) inconsistent self-discipline (6 gadgets); and (v) corporal punishment (3 gadgets). Every merchandise is scored on a 5-point scale, with increased scores indicating better power of the related subscale. Psychological misery in kids of members was assessed utilizing the youth-reported model of the Pediatric Signs Guidelines (PSC), which has been validated in 6- to 16-year-olds [35]. The PSC includes 35 gadgets rated on a 3-point scale and yields a complete rating, in addition to 3 subscale scores of attentional (5 gadgets), internalizing (5 gadgets), and externalizing (7 gadgets) issues. Greater scores point out extra extreme difficulties within the respective area. Moreover, at baseline, prior publicity to traumatic occasions was assessed utilizing an tailored type of printed Traumatic Occasions Checklists [49,50]; this 27-item dichotomously scored guidelines offered a possible rating of 27, with increased scores indicating better publicity to traumatic occasions. Ongoing stressors have been assessed at baseline utilizing the 17-item Put up-Migration Residing Difficulties guidelines [51], which assesses the extent to which post-migration challenges concern the respondent over the prior 12 months; gadgets have been rated on a 5-point scale, with gadgets scores ≥2 (a reasonably significant issue) have been outlined because the stressor being current, with increased scores indicating extra ongoing stressors. This scale has beforehand been utilized in Arabic-speaking refugees [52].
All assessments have been carried out by Arabic-speaking Jordanians, who obtained 4 days of coaching in analysis ethics, the evaluation battery, and normal interviewing strategies, and psychological first assist as a way to permit them to handle any distressed members throughout an evaluation. Assessments have been carried out on moveable tablets to make sure that information might be reliably collected and uploaded. On the idea {that a} proportion of members have been inadequately literate in Arabic, assessors verbally administered the questions and assessors entered members’ responses on the tablets.
Statistical analyses
We based mostly our energy evaluation on prior trials of gPM+ [10] and aimed for a medium Cohen’s d impact measurement of 0.4 within the gPM+ group at 3-month follow-up (the first consequence time level). Energy calculations counsel a minimal pattern measurement of 133 members per group (energy = 0.90, a = 0.05, two-sided). Considering an anticipated 35% attrition at 3-month follow-up, we purpose to incorporate a complete variety of 410 members (205 in gPM+ and 205 in EUC).
Analyses targeted totally on intent-to-treat evaluation. Linear blended fashions have been used to review differential results of every remedy situation as a result of this methodology permits the variety of observations to range between members. Additional, this statistical method handles lacking information by together with all out there information and utilizing most probability estimation strategies, which makes legitimate inferences underneath the belief of knowledge lacking at random [53]. Fastened (intervention, time of evaluation) results and their interactions have been entered within the unstructured fashions, which offered an index of the relative results of the remedies; time of evaluation included baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. Fastened results parameters have been examined with the Wald take a look at (t take a look at, p < .05, two-sided) and 95% confidence intervals (no Bonferroni adjustment was made). Analyses deal with the first (HSCL) and secondary (WHODAS, PCL, PSYCHLOPS, PG-13, PQB, APQ, and PSC scores) outcomes, with the principle consequence level being the 3-month follow-up. Lacking information have been assumed to be random on the idea that members finishing the 3-month evaluation and those that have been lacking didn’t differ by way of age, schooling stage, trauma publicity, or main consequence measures at baseline (S1 Table). Additional, there have been solely 43 (10.5%) of circumstances by which there was no follow-up information on the first consequence measures. To evaluate the robustness of this statistical method, we carried out subsequent analyses together with solely members who accomplished the 3-month follow-up. Additional, in recognition of the variable impacts of prior traumatic experiences and ongoing stressors skilled by members, analyses have been repeated adjusting the fashions utilizing baseline scores of the Traumatic Occasions Guidelines and the Put up-Migration Residing Difficulties as covariates. To find out the effectiveness of the intervention on refugees with possible clinically vital issues, we additionally carried out sensitivity analyses specializing in refugees who offered with possible nervousness or despair on the HSCL (outlined as imply merchandise rating ≥2 on nervousness or ≥2.1 on despair subscales). We additionally carried out nonplanned analyses on the minimally necessary distinction for outcomes by evaluating the proportions of members in every remedy arm displaying modifications of greater than 0.5 SDs [54].
To discover the potential position of gPM+ on parenting and youngsters’s psychological well being, an exploratory secondary mediation evaluation was carried out by assessing the direct and oblique results of intervention arm on change in APQ subscale scores from baseline to 3-month follow-up, and alter in PSC subscale scores. The proposed mediation mannequin was examined utilizing the PROCESS macro (Model 3.15; [55]) for SPSS (Model 27), PROCESS Mannequin 4, with 5,000 bootstrapped samples. This mannequin examined the connection between intervention arm on modifications in youngster psychological well being (PSC subscale scores), with modifications in parenting behaviors (APQ subscale scores) because the mediators. All analyses have been overseen by an unbiased statistician who was blind to remedy situation.
Outcomes
Members have been enrolled between October 14, 2019 and March 2, 2020, and the ultimate follow-up assessments have been carried out on July 6, 2020. There have been 1,377 caravans approached, and this resulted in 624 refugees agreeing to be screened. There have been 462 refugees assembly entry standards, of whom 410 proceeded to randomization; 204 refugees have been randomized to gPM+ and 206 to EUC. The first consequence evaluation at 3 months was carried out for 168 (82.4%) members in gPM+ and 189 (91.7%) in EUC. This stage of attrition was throughout the projected 35% margin on which the ability evaluation was calculated. The attrition was a lot decrease than we anticipated, probably due to unfolding occasions in Syria that will have triggered many refugees to be reluctant to return dwelling. Apparently, there was 10% better attrition within the gPM+ arm than EUC on the 3-month follow-up, probably reflecting fatigue in collaborating within the trial. No antagonistic occasions have been attributable to the interventions or the trial.
Members who have been misplaced at follow-up didn’t differ from those that have been retained by way of age, schooling stage, trauma publicity, or baseline scores on any consequence measures apart from those that have been misplaced to follow-up having had increased constructive parenting and parental involvement scores (S2 Table). The flowchart of participant recruitment and retention is reported in Fig 1. Pattern traits are offered in Table 1. The imply age of members was 40.03 years (SD 6.95), most have been feminine (300 [70.2%] females, 110 [29.8%] males), and the imply time since leaving their dwelling in Syria was 5.89 years (SD 1.67; vary: 1 to 9 years). The demographic traits weren’t considerably completely different between the two remedy arms. Notably, the members reported frequent publicity to probably traumatic occasions, together with hazard throughout fleeing from Syria (84.6%), direct publicity to battle (69.3%), accidents (66.3%), disasters (31.7%), severe damage (23.9%), compelled separation from household (21.5%), and homicide of somebody near them (11.7%) (see Table 2). When it comes to present stressors, many refugees reported poverty (90.2%), poor work situations (83.4%), loneliness (70.2%), fear for household in Syria (77.3%), and poor healthcare (67.1%). The pattern included 267 (65.1%) with possible despair, 321 (78.3%) with possible nervousness dysfunction, and 138 refugees (61.5%) who reported possible PTSD.
Fig 1. Movement diagram of progress by way of phases of a randomized trial evaluating the group downside administration plus intervention vs EUC in Syrian refugees in Azraq Refugee Camp, Jordan.
5 members accomplished the 3-month follow-up who didn’t full the posttreatment evaluation. EUC, enhanced common care; gPM+, Group Downside Administration Plus.
The imply variety of gPM+ periods attended was 3.96 (SD 1.14), with 180 (88%) members attending at the very least 3 periods. Twenty-three gPM+ periods have been noticed all through the research to judge the intervention constancy, 22 (95.7%) of which have been assessed to be passable. Two-thirds (126; 66.7%) of refugees in EUC reported consulting a well being skilled within the camp throughout the interval of the trial; greater than half of those consultations have been to the camp medical officers (58.2%). Two members in gPM+ disclosed their allocation throughout the posttreatment evaluation, and one participant in gPM+ disclosed their allocation on the follow-up evaluation.
The first and secondary outcomes at every time level are offered in Table 3. When it comes to main outcomes, on the 3-month follow-up evaluation, the gPM+ had a better discount in HSCL-Melancholy scores than these within the EUC group (adjusted imply distinction 3.69, 95% CI 1.90 to five.48; p < .001; impact measurement, 0.40). There have been extra members within the gPM+ arm (102; 50.0%) relative to EUC (89; 43.2%) attaining a minimally necessary distinction in despair between baseline and follow-up (χ2 = 6.67, p = .03) (S2 Table). There was no distinction between remedy arms in change in nervousness ranges (adjusted imply distinction −0.56, 95% CI −2.09 to 0.96; p = .47; impact measurement, −0.03) on the 3-month follow-up.
When it comes to secondary outcomes, at 3 months, members within the gPM+ situation had better reductions in scores than EUC on the PSYCHLOPS (adjusted imply distinction 0.88, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.69; p = .03), and the APQ self-discipline subscale (adjusted imply distinction 1.54, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.05; p < .001). There have been extra members within the gPM+ arm relative to EUC attaining a minimally necessary distinction between baseline and 3-month follow-up for WHODAS (gPM+ 76.2%, EUC 66.1%); χ2 6.67, p = 0.04). There have been no vital variations at 3 months in modifications of PTSD (adjusted imply distinction −0.68, 95% CI −4.01 to 2.66; p = 0.69), incapacity (adjusted imply distinction −1.21, 95% CI −2.80 to 0.37; p = .13), grief (adjusted imply distinction −0.29, 95% CI −3.14 to 2.55; p = .84), prodromal signs (adjusted imply distinction −0.53, 95% CI −1.18 to 0.12; p = .11), parental involvement (adjusted imply distinction 0.14, 95% CI −2.06 to 2.34; p = .90), parental supervision (adjusted imply distinction 0.15, 95% CI −0.91 to 1.99; p = .79) constructive parenting (adjusted imply distinction −0.15, 95% CI −1.30 to 0.99; p = .79), parental punishment (adjusted imply distinction −0.26, 95% CI −0.80 to 0.27; p = .34), kids’s attentional issues (adjusted imply distinction −0.24, 95% CI −0.81 to 0.33; p = .41), kids’s internalizing issues (adjusted imply distinction 0.03, 95% CI −0.37 to 0.42; p = .89), or kids’s externalizing issues (adjusted imply distinction 0.16, 95% CI −0.23 to 0.56; p = .41).
The sensitivity evaluation that targeted solely on members that have been retained on the 3-month follow-up didn’t change any of the outcomes noticed in linear blended fashions analyses (S3 Table). Outcomes of the covariate-adjusted evaluation have been in line with these within the main linear blended mannequin evaluation; this indicated that diploma of trauma publicity and ongoing stressors didn’t considerably affect outcomes (S4 Table); the impact measurement for the despair consequence was increased after controlling for these elements relative to the preliminary evaluation (0.90 versus 0.40). The evaluation that targeted solely on members with possible nervousness or depressive dysfunction indicated that the identical outcomes have been noticed as with the first analyses; particularly, gPM+ resulted in better reductions in despair, personally recognized issues, and disciplinary parenting relative to EUC (S5 Table).
The mediation evaluation indicated vital oblique paths between receiving gPM+ and better reductions within the kids’s reported attentional (β = 0.11, SE .07; 95% CI .003, .27) and internalizing (β = 0.08, SE .05; 95% CI .003, .19) issues have been mediated by way of reductions in caregivers’ disciplinary (Figs 2 and S1). These patterns counsel that gPM+ was related to enhancements in kids’s attentional and internalizing issues when there was a rise in constant disciplinary behaviors in caregivers.
Fig 2. Path mannequin of relationship between intervention, change in parenting fashion, and alter in kids’s psychological well being.
Path mannequin demonstrates that for refugees in gPM+, the extra disciplinary parenting decreased (as measured by the APQ), there was a better lower of their kids’s attentional (A) and internalizing (B) issues (as measured by the PSC). APQ, Alabama Parenting Questionnaire; EUC, enhanced common care; gPM+, Group Downside Administration Plus; PM+, Downside Administration Plus; PSC, Pediatric Signs Guidelines. Worth are unstandardized coefficients (commonplace error). *Important paths.
Dialogue
This trial examined the effectiveness of the WHO gPM+ intervention in Syrian refugees who have been residing in a safe refugee camp and who had fled the battle in Syria lately and reported psychological misery. The foremost findings have been that gPM+ considerably lowered despair and incapacity in refugees and likewise lowered disciplinary parenting conduct. The intervention didn’t exhibit reductions in nervousness, PTSD, grief, prodromal signs, or youngster psychological well being issues.
The discovering of lowered despair, incapacity, and personally recognized issues is in line with earlier studies of PM+ [10,11] and gPM+ [12]. The demonstration that gPM+ could be efficient in camp-based refugees confirms the helpful temporary psychological well being intervention in these settings. gPM+ depends on members implementing methods to interact in problem-solving, behavioral activation, and accessing social help; a few of these actions could also be restricted within the camp context due to restricted motion throughout the camp, restricted alternatives to realize employment, and constraints on making selections that affect on one’s future. Most refugee camps all over the world lack ample specialist psychological well being providers, and so with the ability to implement packages akin to gPM+ delivered by nonspecialists presents a scalable means to handle frequent psychological problems of refugees in these settings. It’s noteworthy that regardless of a quick coaching of solely 8 days for the group facilitators in gPM+, the group periods resulted in improved psychological well being; this quantity of coaching is comparable with different evidence-based psychosocial packages [56] and is a vital requisite for scalable interventions. Group-based packages could also be less expensive than individually administered psychological interventions [57], and when they are often successfully delivered by nonspecialists, this additional will increase the probability that packages akin to gPM+ might be applied in refugee camps in poorly resourced nations [58]. Additional, group interventions could be extra acceptable in collectivist societies, together with Syrian refugees [36].
Apparently, and in distinction to prior trials of PM+ and gPM+ in neighborhood settings [10,12], the intervention didn’t scale back nervousness or PTSD ranges relative to EUC. Furthermore, the impact sizes noticed on this research have been usually decrease than these noticed in prior trials of gPM+ [12]. We additionally noticed that there have been no vital variations between remedy arms by way of PTSD, incapacity, grief, prodromal signs, or childhood psychological well being outcomes ranges. It’s noteworthy that earlier trials of PM+ or gPM+ have reported reductions in PTSD and incapacity [10,12]. The discrepancies between the present findings and people of different trials could also be attributed to a number of elements. First, the post-migration challenges within the camp and insecurity of probably being returned to Syria might have contributed to persistent psychological well being difficulties. On this context, it’s price noting that many refugees reported vital stressors within the camp, together with poverty, worry for individuals who are in Syria, being separated from household, and loneliness. Additional, when these elements have been managed for within the secondary evaluation, we famous that the impact measurement for lowered despair in gPM+ was markedly bigger than after they weren’t managed for; this helps the conclusion that the continuing stressors within the camp might have mitigated the potential positive factors of gPM+. Second, 61.5% of the members met standards for PTSD at entry to the research, and plenty of had reported publicity to extreme traumatic occasions; this severity of symptomatology and historical past of trauma publicity might replicate a problem for temporary transdiagnostic interventions with a inhabitants akin to refugees not too long ago uncovered to battle and experiencing excessive charges of PTSD residing underneath harsh situations of a refugee camp. Earlier trials haven’t comprised war-affected refugee populations, and this trial might have recruited individuals with extra extreme psychopathology responses. Third, we be aware that the follow-up assessments occurred within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic when there have been extra stressors within the camp, lockdowns, and fears of virus unfold. This may increasingly have restricted the positive factors on this trial relative to different trials. It’s fascinating that the interpretation that camp stressors might have restricted the extent to which gPM+ lowered nervousness and different psychological well being outcomes doesn’t apply to the identical extent to despair. It’s potential that the talents taught in gPM+ assisted refugees in managing depression-related issues akin to social withdrawal and passivity, however issues related to nervousness and traumatic stress weren’t so strongly focused. Contemplating the prominence of trauma histories on this pattern, it’s potential that integrating a element into gPM+ that entails addressing trauma recollections might present stronger remedy results. There’s proof that this type of remedy is efficient in lowering posttraumatic stress in refugees [59].
A very novel discovering was that gPM+ lowered maladaptive disciplinary parenting conduct in refugees. Harsh self-discipline might embrace makes an attempt to regulate a baby by verbal (shouting) or bodily (hitting) abusive means. There’s a lot proof that harsh disciplinary parenting can result in a spread of kid emotional and behavioral issues, together with poor faculty efficiency [60,61]. Apparently, gPM+ resulted in lowered harsh disciplinary conduct although it’s not an express parenting program. It may be speculated that the enhancements in depressive temper, discount in private issues, and acquisition of downside administration abilities resulted in much less maladaptive parenting conduct [62]. Though solely an exploratory evaluation was carried out with members who accomplished the 3-month follow-up, we noticed that gPM+ was related to lowered attentional and internalizing issues in refugees’ kids through the caregivers’ lowered disciplinary conduct. This accords with proof from parenting packages that lowering maladaptive self-discipline can have constructive impacts on kids’s psychological well being [63,64]. This is a vital discovering as a result of, though tentative at this stage, it means that temporary behavioral packages geared toward refugees can have an oblique profit on their kids by lowering maladaptive parenting practices. This conclusion is supported by current pilot analysis with parenting packages of Syrian refugees, which has discovered that it improved caregivers’ estimates of their kids’s psychological well-being [17]. On this context, it’s noteworthy that responses made throughout our cultural adaptation of gPM+ indicated a possible profit in including parental coaching; nonetheless, this element couldn’t be accommodated within the present trial. Taken collectively, these qualitative and quantitative information counsel that future diversifications might usefully take a look at gPM+ with dad or mum coaching for caregivers [36].
Strengths of this research included random allocation, adherence to the remedy protocols, use of nonspecialist suppliers, in depth cultural adaptation of gPM+ for Syrian refugees, and wonderful retention at follow-up. It’s troublesome to realize the rigor of a randomized managed trial in a safe refugee camp; nonetheless, this research adhered to the requirements of managed trials. Limitations included use of some measures that haven’t been culturally validated. Whereas the HSCL, WHODAS, and PCL have been validated in Arabic populations, different measures used on this trial weren’t culturally tailored for this inhabitants. This lack of correct adaptation might end in use of linguistically inappropriate idioms, failure to measure the supposed constructs in Syrian refugees, and likewise the tailored measures might not possess optimum psychometric properties. We additionally be aware that provision of weekly group contact was not matched throughout situations, and there was a preponderance of females within the research. Participation of males in psychological trials is way wanted in world psychological well being; nonetheless, they’re usually troublesome to recruit into packages. Concerted efforts are wanted in future analysis and implementation packages to recruit extra males to psychosocial packages. We have been additionally not in a position to get hold of goal documentation concerning the providers offered by well being staff within the camp to EUC members. Prescription of psychotropic remedy is frequent observe, but this data couldn’t be detailed. Additional, there may be stigma concerning consulting a psychologist or psychological well being skilled on this setting, and so there could also be underreporting or poor attendance to those providers; many refugees might seek the advice of physicians as a substitute of psychological well being professionals. Though we retained 87.1% of the pattern at follow-up, and secondary analyses indicated that this didn’t affect our findings, we acknowledge that the dropouts from gPM+ and the follow-up assessments are a limitation. Lastly, we shouldn’t have information to validate the efficacy of the masking of assessors, akin to by having assessors guess the members’ allotted situation; this requirement is just not within the CONSORT guidelines, and we be aware that guessing the allotted remedy arm could also be influenced by statement of the participant’s feedback somewhat than reflecting efficacy of masking procedures [65]. Nonetheless, having this data might present stronger proof that masking was efficiently achieved.
When it comes to implications for scientific observe, the present findings counsel that gPM+ is an efficient and scalable intervention that may be utilized in refugee camps. The stressors confronted by many refugees in refugee camp settings point out that there’s a want for scalable psychological well being interventions that may be delivered by lay suppliers in these contexts. Recognizing the dearth of success in lowering PTSD and different secondary outcomes, the present findings counsel that completely different interventions could also be indicated for these extra complicated scientific situations. It’s potential that the best framework to handle extra extreme psychological situations is a stepped care system, by which refugees who don’t reply to gPM+ are supplied a extra intensive psychological well being program. On this context, it’s price noting that there are evidence-based trauma-focused therapies that may be utilized to refugees with PTSD, which can be offered as a extra specialist intervention for individuals who don’t reply to gPM+. Alternately, individuals might be triaged in a method that those that meet standards for PTSD could also be referred for extra intensive remedy as a substitute of receiving gPM+. Additional, the discovering that gPM+ led to reductions in inconsistency disciplinary parenting conduct, and the statement that this was related to lowered internalizing issues of their kids, underscores the necessity for additional analysis in how parenting could be focused to enhance the psychological well being of refugees’ kids. Within the context of elevated charges of psychological well being issues in refugee kids [13], and the shortage of efficient, temporary packages to enhance kids’s emotional and behavioral issues, it’s potential that addressing the psychological well being of refugees and their parenting practices might present a big and cost-effective means to handle this main world psychological well being concern.
In conclusion, contemplating the various refugees all over the world in camps, the prevalence of psychological problems in these populations, and the shortage of assets to supply efficient psychological well being packages, the present findings point out that gPM+ is an efficient program to enhance the psychological well being of refuges that may be scaled up in these settings. We be aware that the impact sizes weren’t giant, and it’s probably that stepped care providers could also be wanted to handle the extra extreme psychological well being situations of refugees. The discovering that gPM+ can not directly profit the psychological well-being of refugees’ kids by enhancing parenting conduct opens up alternatives to help kids through temporary packages that may enhance refugees’ psychological well being.
Supporting data
S1 Fig. Path mannequin of relationship between gPM+/EUC, change in parenting fashion, and alter in kids’s externalizing issues.
Path mannequin demonstrates that there was a big relationship between gPM+ and reductions in disciplinary parenting (as measured by the APQ) however no affiliation between parenting fashion and externalizing issues (as measured by the PSC). Worth are unstandardized coefficients (commonplace error). *Important paths. APQ, Alabama Parenting Questionnaire; EUC, enhanced common care; gPM+, Group Downside Administration Plus; PSC, Pediatric Signs Guidelines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003949.s008
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
UNHCR. International Developments: Compelled Displacement in 2019, 2020. Out there from: https://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2019/ - 2.
Charlson F, van Ommeren M, Flaxman A, Cornett J, Whiteford H, Saxena S. New WHO prevalence estimates of psychological problems in battle settings: a scientific evaluation and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394:240–8. pmid:31200992 - 3.
Patel V, Saxena S, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Baingana F, Bolton P, et al. The Lancet Fee on world psychological well being and sustainable improvement. Lancet. 2018;392:1553–98. pmid:30314863 - 4.
Tol WA, Patel V, Tomlinson M, Baingana F, Galappatti A, Silove D, et al. Relevance or excellence? Setting analysis priorities for psychological well being and psychosocial help in humanitarian settings. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2012;20:25–36. pmid:22335180 - 5.
Connolly SM, Vanchu-Orosco M, Warner J, Seidi PA, Edwards J, Boath E, et al. Psychological well being interventions by lay counsellors: a scientific evaluation and meta-analysis. Bull World Well being Organ. 2021;99:572–82. pmid:34354312 - 6.
Singla DR, Kohrt B, Murray LK, Anand A, Chorpita BF, Patel V. Psychological remedies for the world: Classes from low- and middle-income nations. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:149–81. pmid:28482687 - 7.
van Ginneken N, Tharyan P, Lewin S, Rao GN, Meera SM, Pian J, et al. Non-specialist well being employee interventions for the care of psychological, neurological and substance-abuse problems in low- and middle-income nations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD009149. pmid:24249541 - 8.
World Well being Group. Particular person psychological assist for adults impaired by misery in communities uncovered to adversity. [Generic field-trial version 1.0). Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/emergencies/problem_management_plus/en - 9.
Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M, Tay AK, Rahman A, Schafer A, et al. Problem Management Plus [PM+): a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention for common mental health problems. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:354–7. pmid:26407793 - 10.
Rahman A, Hamdani SU, Awan NR, Bryant RA, Dawson KS, Khan MF, et al. Effect of a multicomponent behavioral intervention in adults impaired by psychological distress in a conflict-affected area of Pakistan: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:2609–17. pmid:27837602 - 11.
Bryant RA, Schafer A, Dawson KS, Anjuri D, Mulili C, Ndogoni L, et al. Effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention on psychological distress among women with a history of gender-based violence in urban Kenya: a randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14:e1002371. pmid:28809935 - 12.
Rahman A, Khan MN, Hamdani SU, Chiumento A, Akhtar P, Nazir H, et al. Effectiveness of a brief group psychological intervention for women in a post-conflict setting in Pakistan: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1733–44. pmid:30948286 - 13.
Turrini G, Purgato M, Acarturk C, Anttila M, Au T, Ballette F, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in asylum seekers and refugees: systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28:376–88. pmid:30739625 - 14.
Bronstein I, Montgomery P. Psychological distress in refugee children: a systematic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011;14:44–56. pmid:21181268 - 15.
Reed RV, Fazel M, Jones L, Panter-Brick C, Stein A. Mental health of displaced and refugee children resettled in low-income and middle-income countries: risk and protective factors. Lancet. 2012;379:250–65. pmid:21835460 - 16.
Tol WA, Song S, Jordans MJ. Annual research review: resilience and mental health in children and adolescents living in areas of armed conflict—a systematic review of findings in low- and middle-income countries. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;54:445–60. pmid:23414226 - 17.
Miller KE, Koppenol-Gonzalez GV, Arnous M, Tossyeh F, Chen A, Nahas N, et al. Supporting Syrian families displaced by armed conflict: a pilot randomized controlled trial of the Caregiver Support Intervention. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;106:104512. pmid:32408022 - 18.
Panter-Brick C, Grimon MP, Eggerman M. Caregiver-child mental health: a prospective study in conflict and refugee settings. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55:313–27. pmid:24286507 - 19.
Bryant R, Edwards B, Creamer MC, O’Donnell M, Forbes D, Felmingham KL, et al. A population-based study of the impact of posttraumatic stress disorder on refugees’ parenting and their children’s mental health. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3:e249–58. pmid:29731158 - 20.
Bryant RA, Edwards B, Creamer M, O’Donnell M, Forbes D, Felmingham KL, et al. Prolonged grief in refugees, parenting behavior, and children’s mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021;55(9):863–73. pmid:33124446 - 21.
Hinton DE, Rasmussen A, Nou L, Pollack MH, Good MJ. Anger, PTSD, and the nuclear family: a study of Cambodian refugees. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1387–94. pmid:19748169 - 22.
Thabet AA, Ibraheem AN, Shivram R, Winter EA, Vostanis P. Parenting support and PTSD in children of a war zone. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009;55:226–37. pmid:19383666 - 23.
Cuijpers P, Weitz E, Karyotaki E, Garber J, Andersson G. The effects of psychological treatment of maternal depression on children and parental functioning: a meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;24:237–45. pmid:25522839 - 24.
UNHCR. Shelter. 2020. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/shelter.html. - 25.
Drescher A, Kiselev N, Akhtar A, Acarturk C, Bryant RA, Ilkkursun Z, et al. Problems after flight: understanding and comparing Syrians’ perspectives in the Middle East and Europe. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:717. pmid:33849507 - 26.
Kakaje A, Al Zohbi R, Hosam Aldeen O, Makki L, Alyousbashi A, Alhaffar MBA. Mental disorder and PTSD in Syria during wartime: a nationwide crisis. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:2. pmid:33388026 - 27.
Rasmussen A, Nguyen L, Wilkinson J, Vundla S, Raghavan S, Miller KE, et al. Rates and impact of trauma and current stressors among Darfuri refugees in Eastern Chad. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010;80:227–36. pmid:20553516 - 28.
Department of Statistics [DOS) and ICF. Jordan Population and Family and Health Survey 2017–18. Amman, Jordan, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: DOS and ICF; 2019. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR346/FR346.pdf - 29.
Akhtar A, Giardinelli L, Bawaneh A, Awwad M, Naser H, Whitney C, et al. Group problem management plus [gPM+) in the treatment of common mental disorders in Syrian refugees in a Jordanian camp: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:390. pmid:32216762 - 30.
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32:959–76. pmid:12214795 - 31.
WHODAS Group. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Achedule II. Geneva: WHO; 2000. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health/who-disability-assessment-schedule - 32.
Slade T, Grove R, Burgess P. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: normative data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45:308–16. pmid:21332432 - 33.
Shawyer F, Enticott JC, Block AA, Cheng I-H, Meadows GN. The mental health status of refugees and asylum seekers attending a refugee health clinic including comparisons with a matched sample of Australian-born residents. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:76. pmid:28222713 - 34.
Bhutta ZA. Beyond informed consent. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:771–777. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/269254 pmid:15643799 - 35.
Jellinek MS, Murphy JM, Little M, Pagano ME, Comer DM, Kelleher KJ. Use of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist to screen for psychosocial problems in pediatric primary care: a national feasibility study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:254–60. pmid:10086402 - 36.
Akhtar A, Engels MH, Bawaneh A, Bird M, Bryant R, Cuijpers P, et al. Cultural adaptation of a low-intensity group psychological intervention for Syrian refugees. Inter Des. 2021;19:48–57. - 37.
Bernal G, Saez-Santiago E. Culturally centered psychological interventions. J Community Psychol. 2006;34:121–32. - 38.
World Health Organization. Group psychological help for adults impaired by distress in communities exposed to adversity [Generic field-trial version 1.0). Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/334055 - 39.
Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 1974;19:1–15. pmid:4808738 - 40.
Mahfoud Z, Kobeissi L, Peters TJ, Araya R, Ghantous Z, Khoury B. The Arabic validation of the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25 against MINI in a disadvantaged suburb of Beirut, Lebanon Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2013;13:17–33. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/tijepa2012/articles/vol-13-1 - 41.
Weathers FW, Litz BT, Keane TM, Palmieri PA, Marx BP, Schnurr PP. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Scale available at from the National Center for PTSD. 2013. Available from: https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp - 42.
Ibrahim H, Ertl V, Catani C, Ismail AA, Neuner F. The validity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:259. pmid:30115040 - 43.
Ashworth M, Shepherd M, Christey J, Matthews V, Wright K, Parmentier H, et al. A client-centred psychometric instrument: the development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’ (‘Psychological Outcome Profiles’). Counsel Psychother Res. 2004;4:27–33. - 44.
Heoinsson H, Kristjansdottir H, Olason DP, Sigurosson JF. A validation and replication study of the patient-generated measure PSYCHLOPS on an Icelandic clinical population. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2013;29:89–95. - 45.
Czachowski S, Seed P, Schofield P, Ashworth M. Measuring psychological change during cognitive behaviour therapy in primary care: a Polish study using ’PSYCHLOPS’ (Psychological Outcome Profiles). PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27378. pmid:22194783 - 46.
Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Goodkin K, et al. Prolonged Grief Disorder: psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000121. pmid:19652695 - 47.
Loewy RL, Pearson R, Vinogradov S, Bearden CE, Cannon TD. Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire—brief version (PQ-B). Schizophr Res. 2011;129:42–6. pmid:21511440 - 48.
Maguin E, Nochajski TH, De Wit DJ, Safyer A. Examining the validity of the adapted Alabama Parenting Questionnaire-Parent Global Report Version. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:613–25. pmid:26348028 - 49.
Foa EB, Cashman L, Jaycox LH, Perry KJ. The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale. Psychol Assess. 1997;9:445–51. pmid:26691504 - 50.
Shoeb M, Weinstein H, Mollica R. The Harvard trauma questionnaire: adapting a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in Iraqi refugees. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007;53:447–63. pmid:18018666 - 51.
Silove D, Sinnerbrink I, Field A, Manicavasagar V, Steel Z. Anxiety, depression and PTSD in asylum-seekers: assocations with pre-migration trauma and post-migration stressors. Br J Psychiatry. 1997;170:351–7. pmid:9246254 - 52.
Schick M, Zumwald A, Knopfli B, Nickerson A, Bryant RA, Schnyder U, et al. Challenging future, challenging past: the relationship of social integration and psychological impairment in traumatized refugees. Europ J Psychotraum. 2016;7:28057. pmid:26886484 - 53.
Raudenbush SW. Comparing personal trajectories and drawing causal inferences from longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:501–25. pmid:11148315 - 54.
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92. pmid:12719681 - 55.
Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2017. - 56.
Bolton P, Lee C, Haroz EE, Murray L, Dorsey S, Robinson C, et al. A transdiagnostic community-based mental health treatment for comorbid disorders: development and outcomes of a randomized controlled trial among Burmese refugees in Thailand. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001757. pmid:25386945 - 57.
Huntley AL, Araya R, Salisbury C. Group psychological therapies for depression in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:184–90. pmid:22383765 - 58.
Hamdani SU, Huma ZE, Rahman A, Wang D, Chen T, van Ommeren M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of WHO Problem Management Plus for adults with mood and anxiety disorders in a post-conflict area of Pakistan: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217:623–9. pmid:32720628 - 59.
Neuner F, Schauer M, Klaschik C, Karunakara U, Elbert T. A comparison of narrative exposure therapy, supportive counseling, and psychoeducation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in an african refugee settlement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:579–87. pmid:15301642 - 60.
Teicher MH, Samson JA, Polcari A, McGreenery CE. Sticks, stones, and hurtful words: relative effects of various forms of childhood maltreatment. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:993–1000. pmid:16741199 - 61.
Rajyaguru P, Moran P, Cordero M, Pearson R. Disciplinary parenting practice and child mental health: evidence from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58:108–16 e2. pmid:30577926 - 62.
Sim A, Fazel M, Bowes L, Gardner F. Pathways linking war and displacement to parenting and child adjustment: a qualitative study with Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Soc Sci Med. 2018;200:19–26. pmid:29355827 - 63.
Cova F, Rincon P, Bustos C, Streiner D, King M, Saldivia S, et al. Randomized cluster trial of a parenting program in Chile: key mediators in the decrease in behavior problems in preschool children. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;25:320–32. pmid:31353936 - 64.
Ward CL, Wessels IM, Lachman JM, Hutchings J, Cluver LD, Kassanjee R, et al. Parenting for lifelong health for young children: a randomized controlled trial of a parenting program in South Africa to prevent harsh parenting and child conduct problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61:503–12. pmid:31535371 - 65.
Sackett DL. Turning a blind eye: why we don’t test for blindness at the end of our trials. BMJ. 2004;328:1136. pmid:15130997
