The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 (FAO, 2020); https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
Costello, C. et al. The way forward for meals from the ocean. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y (2020).
Malcorps, W. et al. The sustainability conundrum of fishmeal substitution by plant substances in shrimp feeds. Sustainability 11, 1212 (2019).
Cashion, T., le Manach, F., Zeller, D. & Pauly, D. Most fish destined for fishmeal manufacturing are food-grade fish. Fish Fish. 18, 837–844 (2017).
Willer, D. F. & Aldridge, D. C. Microencapsulated diets to enhance bivalve shellfish aquaculture for world meals safety. Glob. Meals Secur. 23, 64–73 (2019).
Naylor, R. L. et al. A 20-year retrospective evaluate of worldwide aquaculture. Nature 591, 551–563 (2021).
Campanati, C., Willer, D. F., Schubert, J. & Aldridge, D. C. Sustainable intensification of aquaculture by nutrient recycling and round economies: extra fish, much less waste, blue development. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2021.1897520 (2021).
Belton, B. et al. Farming fish within the sea won’t nourish the world. Nat. Commun. 11, 5804 (2020).
Willett, W. et al. Meals within the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Fee on wholesome diets from sustainable meals techniques. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).
Willer, D. F. & Aldridge, D. C. Sustainable bivalve farming can ship meals safety within the tropics. Nat. Meals 1, 384–388 (2020).
Pelletier, N. L. et al. Influence classes for all times cycle evaluation analysis of seafood manufacturing techniques: evaluate and prospectus. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12, 414–421 (2007).
Turolla, E., Castaldelli, G., Fano, E. A. & Tamburini, E. Life cycle evaluation (LCA) proves that Manila clam farming (Ruditapes philippinarum) is a completely sustainable aquaculture follow and a carbon sink. Sustainability 12, 5252 (2020).
Yield and Dietary Worth of the Commercially Extra Vital Fish Species FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 309 (FAO, 1989).
Fulton, S. Fish and Gasoline: Life Cycle Greenhouse Gasoline Emissions Related to Icelandic Cod, Alaskan Pollock, and Alaskan Pink Salmon Fillets delivered to the UK. MSc thesis, Dalhousie Univ. (2010).
Hospido, A. & Tyedmers, P. Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries. Fish. Res. 76, 174–186 (2005).
Edwards, P., Zhang, W., Belton, B. & Little, D. C. Misunderstandings, myths and mantras in aquaculture: its contribution to world meals provides has been systematically over reported. Mar. Coverage 106, 103547 (2019).
Tamburini, E., Fano, E. A., Castaldelli, G. & Turolla, E. Life cycle evaluation of oyster farming within the Po Delta, northern Italy. Sources 8, 170 (2019).
Willer, D. F. & Aldridge, D. C. Microencapsulated diets to enhance development and survivorship in juvenile European flat oysters (Ostrea edulis). Aquaculture 505, 256–262 (2019).
Botta, R., Asche, F., Borsum, J. S. & Camp, E. V. A evaluate of worldwide oyster aquaculture manufacturing and consumption. Mar. Coverage 117, 103952 (2020).
Tamburini, E., Turolla, E., Fano, E. A. & Castaldelli, G. Sustainability of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) farming within the Po River Delta, northern Italy, primarily based on a life cycle evaluation method. Sustainability 12, 3814 (2020).
Hamilton, H. A., Newton, R., Auchterlonie, N. A. & Müller, D. B. Techniques method to quantify the worldwide omega-3 fatty acid cycle. Nat. Meals 1, 59–62 (2020).
FoodData Central (United States Division of Agriculture Agricultural Analysis Service, 2020); https://fdc.nal.usda.gov
Mensink, G. B. M. et al. Mapping low consumption of micronutrients throughout Europe. Brit. J. Nutr. 110, 755–773 (2013).
Avdelas, L. et al. The decline of mussel aquaculture within the European Union: causes, financial impacts and alternatives. Rev. Aquacult. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12465 (2020).
Xu, C., Li, Q., Chong, J., Liu, S. & Kong, L. Mass choice for development enchancment in black shell line of Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. J. Ocean Univ. China 18, 1411–1416 (2019).
Frösell, M. Mussel Farming Utilizing Numerous Methods Evaluated Utilizing Life Cycle Evaluation (LCA). MSc thesis, Swedish Univ. Agricultural Sciences (2019).
Willer, D. F., Furse, S. & Aldridge, D. C. Microencapsulated algal feeds as a sustainable substitute weight-reduction plan for broodstock in business bivalve aquaculture. Sci. Rep. 10, 12577 (2020).
Farmery, A. Ok. et al. Blind spots in visions of a “blue economic system” may undermine the oceanas contribution to eliminating starvation and malnutrition. One Earth 4, 28–38 (2021).
Froehlich, H. E., Gentry, R. R. & Halpern, B. S. International change in marine aquaculture manufacturing potential underneath local weather change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1745–1750 (2018).
Gentry, R. R. et al. Mapping the worldwide potential for marine aquaculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1317–1324 (2017).
Edwards, P. Aquaculture surroundings interactions: previous, current and sure future developments. Aquaculture 447, 2–14 (2015).
van der Schatte Olivier, A. et al. A world evaluate of the ecosystem providers offered by bivalve aquaculture. Rev. Aquacult. 12, 3–25 (2018).
Ray, N. E., O’Meara, T., Wiliamson, T., Izursa, J. L. & Kangas, P. C. Consideration of carbon dioxide launch throughout shell manufacturing in LCA of bivalves. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23, 1042–1048 (2018).
Wijsman, J. W. M., Troost, Ok., Fang, J. & Roncarati, A. in Items and Providers of Marine Bivalves (eds Smaal, A. C. et al.) 7–26 (Springer Worldwide Publishing, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_2
el Biriane, M. & Barbachi, M. State-of-the-art evaluate on recycled mussel shell waste in concrete and mortar. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 29 (2021).
Gjedrem, T., Robinson, N. & Rye, M. The significance of selective breeding in aquaculture to satisfy future calls for for animal protein: a evaluate. Aquaculture 350–353, 117–129 (2012).
Love, D. C. et al. Efficiency and conduct of provide chains for United States farmed oysters. Aquaculture 515, 734569 (2020).
Martinez-Albores, A. et al. Complementary strategies to enhance the depuration of bivalves: a evaluate. Meals 9, 129 (2020).
Willis, J. E., McClure, J. T., Davidson, J., McClure, C. & Greenwood, S. J. International incidence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in shellfish: ought to Canada take a more in-depth look? Meals Res. Int. 52, 119–135 (2013).
Garrido Gamarro, E., Ryder, J., Elvevoll, E. O. & Olsen, R. L. Microplastics in fish and shellfish–a menace to seafood security? J. Aquat. Meals Prod. Technol. 29, 417–425 (2020).
Baptista, R. C., Rodrigues, H. & Sant’Ana, A. S. Consumption, information, and meals security practices of Brazilian seafood shoppers. Meals Res. Int. 132, 109084 (2020).
Wright, A. C., Fan, Y. & Baker, G. L. Dietary worth and meals security of bivalve molluscan shellfish. J. Shellfish Res. 37, 695–708 (2018).
Meals Availability (Per Capita) Information System (USDA Financial Analysis Service, 2018); https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-per-capita-data-system/
Hassan, F., Geethalakshmi, V., Jeeva, J. C. & Babu, M. R. Mixed impact of lime (Citrus aurantitolia) and drying on decreasing micro organism of public well being significance in edible Oyster (Crassostrea madrasensis). J. Meals Sci. Technol. 50, 203–207 (2013).
Teng, X. et al. Implementing marine useful zoning in China. Mar. Coverage https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.055 (2019).
Mao, Y. et al. in Items and Providers of Marine Bivalves (eds Smaal, A. C. et al.) 51–72 (Springer Worldwide Publishing, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_4
Bonfim, R. C., de Oliveira, F. A., Godoy, R. L., de, O. & Rosenthal, A. A evaluate on excessive hydrostatic strain for bivalve mollusk processing: related facets regarding security and high quality. Meals Sci. Technol. 39, 515–523 (2019).
Huang, H. W., Wu, S. J., Lu, J. Ok., Shyu, Y. T. & Wang, C. Y. Present standing and future developments of high-pressure processing in meals business. Meals Contr. 72, 1–8 (2017).
Truong, B. Q., Buckow, R., Stathopoulos, C. E. & Nguyen, M. H. Advances in high-pressure processing of fish muscle tissue. Meals Eng. Rev. 7, 109–129 (2015).
Chile Nationwide Statistics Database (Instituto Nacional de EstadÃsticas, 2021); https://www.ine.cl/estadisticas/economia/indices-de-precio-e-inflacion/indice-de-precios-al-consumidor
Merdzhanova, A., Panayotova, V., Dobreva, D. A. & Stancheva, R. Impact of thermal stress on the biologically lively lipids of Mytilus galloprovincialis. Bulg. Chem. Commun. 51, 256–261 (2019).
Woodhead, S. F. in A Full Course in Canning and Associated Processes 14th edn, Vol. 3 (ed. Featherstone, S.) 231–265 (Woodhead Publishing, 2016).
Iribarren, D., Hospido, A., Moreira, M. T. & Feijoo, G. Carbon footprint of canned mussels from a business-to-consumer method. A place to begin for mussel processors and coverage makers. Environ. Sci. Coverage 13, 509–521 (2010).
Smetana, S. et al. Construction design of insect-based meat analogs with high-moisture extrusion. J. Meals Eng. 229, 83–85 (2018).
Loveday, S. M. Meals proteins: technological, dietary, and sustainability attributes of conventional and rising proteins. Annu. Rev. Meals Sci. Technol. 10, 311–339 (2019).
Smetana, S., Mathys, A., Knoch, A. & Heinz, V. Meat options: life cycle evaluation of most recognized meat substitutes. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 20, 1254–1267 (2015).
Millman, B. M. Mechanisms of contraction in molluscan muscle. Am. Zool. 7, 583–591 (1967).
Willer, D. F. & Aldridge, D. C. From pest to profit-the potential of shipworms for sustainable aquaculture. Entrance. Maintain. Meals Syst. 4, 575416 (2020).
Messina, M. & Venter, C. Latest surveys on meals allergy prevalence. Nutr. As we speak 55, 22–29 (2020).
Davis, C. M. et al. Medical administration of seafood allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 8, 37–44 (2020).
Wong, L., Tham, E. H. & Lee, B. W. An replace on shellfish allergy. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 19, 236–242 (2019).
Ruethers, T. et al. Seafood allergy: a complete evaluate of fish and shellfish allergens. Mol. Immunol. 100, 28–57 (2018).
Wai, C. Y. Y. et al. Overcoming shellfish allergy: how far have we come? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2234 (2020).
Warren, C. M., Aktas, O. N., Gupta, R. S. & Davis, C. M. Prevalence and traits of grownup shellfish allergy in america. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 1435–1438.e5 (2019).
Franco, S. C., Kuznesof, S., Simoes, B., Clark, B. & Jackson, P. What Do Individuals Consider Aquaculture? Exploring Perceptions and Beliefs of Aquaculture and its Merchandise (Scottish Affiliation for Marine Science, 2019).
Ponce Oliva, R. D. et al. Ocean acidification, shoppers’ preferences, and market adaptation methods within the mussel aquaculture business. Ecol. Econ. 158, 42–50 (2019).
Anacleto, P., Barrento, S., Nunes, M. L., Rosa, R. & Marques, A. Portuguese shoppers’ attitudes and perceptions of bivalve molluscs. Meals Contr. 41, 168–177 (2014).
Lawley, M. & Birch, D. Exploring level of sale methods for enhancing seafood retailing: the case of the Australian oyster business. J. Meals Prod. Market. 22, 792–808 (2016).
Mueller Unfastened, S., Peschel, A. & Grebitus, C. Quantifying results of comfort and product packaging on shopper preferences and market share of seafood merchandise: the case of oysters. Meals Qual. Choose. 28, 492–504 (2013).
Fabinyi, M. & Liu, N. The social context of the Chinese language meals system: an ethnographic examine of the Beijing seafood market. Sustainability 8, 244 (2016).
Barone, R. S. C., Lorenz, E. Ok., Sonoda, D. Y. & Cyrino, J. E. P. Fish and fishery merchandise commerce in Brazil, 2005 to 2015: a evaluate of accessible knowledge and developments. Sci. Agric. 74, 417–424 (2017).
Khan, A. S. & Sesay, S. S. S. Seafood insecurity, bush meat consumption, and public well being emergency in West Africa: did we miss the early warning indicators of an Ebola epidemic? Mar. Stud. 14, 3 (2015).