Introduction
Anaphylaxis is essentially the most extreme type of allergy and is characterised by an acute, probably life-threatening systemic response of speedy onset.1 Triggers and epidemiological elements related to anaphylaxis range with age, tradition, and life-style.2 Latest knowledge from England have demonstrated that the extent of sure particular pollen, together with Fraxinus (Ash), Ambrosia (Ragweed), and Quercus (Oak), are related to larger danger of seasonality in food-induced anaphylaxis hospital admissions3 Equally, one examine in Sweden confirmed that the variety of food-related anaphylaxis occasions amongst youngsters allergic to pollen elevated throughout tree pollen season;4 the above-mentioned research elevate the likelihood that sensitization to pollen cross-reactive meals might result in an elevated danger of anaphylaxis through the pollen season. Anaphylactic reactions might happen both as a result of secure cross-reactive proteins (equivalent to LTP), or augmentation elements (giant quantities of meals, train, and pollen season) that enhance response severity and high-level pollen publicity might set off anaphylaxis in very uncommon instances.5–8
Pollen-related meals (eg, fruits, greens, nuts, cereals, and legumes) are the principle meals triggers of anaphylaxis in older youngsters, particularly amongst people with pollen allergy or sensitized to pollen, which is often known as pollen-food allergy syndrome (PFAS).2,9,10 About 9% of PFAS sufferers expertise anaphylaxis.11 Provided that the etiology of PFAS is said to pollen sensitization, geographical distribution of pollen allergens and regional dietary habits affect pollen-related meals set off sensitization profiles and scientific signs. In northern China, birch and mugwort are widespread pollen that trigger seasonal respiratory allergic reactions within the spring and autumn, respectively.12,13 Birch pollen has traditionally been thought-about the most typical allergen amongst sufferers with pollen-related meals allergy in Europe.14 Nevertheless, birch pollen sensitization and PFAS at the moment are additionally widespread in China, particularly in northern China.12,15 Apples and hazelnuts are recognized as essentially the most frequent triggers in birch pollen-related meals allergy.16 Anaphylaxis is the first signal of mugwort pollen-related meals allergy in China, and peach is the most typical offender.8
Anaphylaxis in people with pollen sensitization might consequence from PFAS on account of thermostable meals allergens that cross-reactivity with pollen or an IgE allergy to the pollen protein unbiased of meals allergens.17 There may be little proof relating to the traits of anaphylaxis in people with pollen sensitization. The goal of this examine was to determine the principle elicitors of anaphylaxis in pediatric people with pollen sensitization, in order to assist facilitate immediate recognition and administration at an emergency division.
Sufferers and Strategies
Ethics Assertion
This examine was carried out in accordance with the rules said within the Declaration of Helsinki, and the examine protocol was authorized by the Analysis and Ethics Board of Beijing Kids’s Hospital (Approval quantity:2022-E-023-R).
Sufferers and Research Design
This was a retrospective examine of kids with signs and indicators of anaphylaxis who have been referred to a specialised allergy division in a tertiary youngsters’s hospital. Medical data have been retrospectively analyzed to determine the sufferers who have been recognized with “anaphylactic shock” (ICD code T78.201), “anaphylaxis” (ICD code T78.402), and “extreme allergic reactions” (ICD code T78.402) from January 2014 to December 2021. The sufferers’ data have been manually reviewed by a pediatric allergy specialist to verify whether or not the World Allergy Group (WAO) 2020 diagnostic standards have been met, after which we chosen the sufferers with pollen sensitization in accordance with the report of allergen testing (Serum ranges of sIgE testing and/or pores and skin prick testing). A complete of 108 sufferers with anaphylaxis who met the factors have been enrolled on this examine. An in depth historical past was collected by allergists and included a mixed allergic illness. Elements evaluated in our evaluation included demographic knowledge (eg, age and intercourse); scientific traits of the response (potential triggers and severity); comorbidities (prior historical past of anaphylaxis, bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis); acute administration. The flowchart is proven in Figure 1.
 |
Determine 1 Research assessment circulate chart. |
Medical Diagnostic Standards and Severity Grading
Evaluation of the outpatients with anaphylaxis was primarily based on the WAO 2020 standards. Primarily based on the present diagnostic standards, anaphylaxis was outlined as an acute allergic response involving greater than two organ methods or life-threatening compromise in respiration and/or circulation alone. A modified grading system described by Muraro et al was used to categorise the severity of anaphylaxis.18 Extreme reactions have been outlined as lack of bowel management, cyanosis, respiratory arrest, hypotension (SBP <70 mm Hg in infants [1 month–1 year old], <70+[2×age] mm Hg in youngsters aged 1–10 years), and <90 mmHg in sufferers aged >10 years) and/or circulatory collapse, arrhythmia, extreme tachycardia and/or cardiac arrest, confusion, and lack of consciousness.
Identification of Triggers
Identification of a meals because the set off for anaphylaxis was primarily based on an acute allergic response through which the onset was associated to a recognized or suspected meals allergen publicity. Serum ranges of particular IgE testing (Phadia AB Uppsala, Sweden) and/or pores and skin prick testing have been carried out to find out aeroallergen and meals allergens. The detection restrict was outlined as 0.35 kUA/L, in accordance with the producer’s suggestions. Pores and skin checks have been considered constructive if the imply wheal diameter was ≥3 mm within the prick take a look at. The pores and skin testing was carried out utilizing standardized allergen extracts (Macro-Union Pharmaceutical Lim, Beijing, China). The diluent was administered as a destructive management, and histamine hydrochloride (1 mg/mL) as a constructive management. As well as, a constructive rating primarily based on the wheal dimension was recorded as follows: Class 1, a wheal diameter between 3 and 5 mm; Class 2, a wheal diameter between 5 and 10 mm; Class 3, a wheal diameter between 1 and a couple of cm; and Class 4, a wheal diameter ≥2 cm and the presence of pseudopods. Drug-induced anaphylactic episodes have been primarily recognized primarily based on medical historical past. If the medical data didn’t recommend a possible set off and allergen-specific checks have been destructive, the episode was recognized as idiopathic.
Statistical Evaluation
All statistical analyses have been carried out utilizing SPSS 20.0 (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL). A descriptive evaluation was used for characterization of the examine inhabitants. The affected person’s demographic and scientific traits have been described as a share for categorical knowledge and as imply ± normal deviation for steady knowledge. To match frequencies of categorical variables, comparisons between completely different teams have been carried out utilizing Pearson’s chi-squared take a look at, or Fisher’s actual take a look at, whereas t-tests have been used to match steady variables. P-values decrease than 0.05 have been thought-about statistically important.
Outcomes
Normal Traits of the Sufferers
There have been 108 youngsters assembly the inclusion standards after handbook assessment utilizing the WAO anaphylaxis standards. These enrolled youngsters have been stratified into two teams primarily based on the severity of anaphylaxis (Table 1). The imply age on the response was 5.8±4.17 years, and it was considerably older in extreme anaphylaxis than in mild-to-moderate anaphylaxis (6.6 ± 4.94 years vs 5.6 ± 3.88 years, p = 0.01). When analyzing the allergic comorbidities, allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis was the most typical comorbidity (87.0%, 94/108). Kids with extreme anaphylaxis have been extra prone to have a historical past of persistent urticaria (16.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.028). By way of the pollen sensitization charge, the most typical sensitized pollen was mugwort (93.5%,101/108), adopted by ragweed (68.5%, 74/108) and birch (40.7%, 44/108). A complete of 76.9% (83/108) of the sufferers confirmed polysensitization to pollen. A complete of 99.1% (107/108) of the sufferers got here from northern China. The geographic distribution of the sufferers is proven in Supplement Table 1. Birch sensitization charge was a lot larger in extreme anaphylaxis sufferers (61.2% vs 32.5%, p = 0.006), whereas monosensitization to mugwort was extra widespread within the mild-to-moderate group (24.7% vs 3.1, p = 0.009); nevertheless, sufferers co-sensitized to birch and mugwort tended to expertise extreme anaphylaxis (19.4% vs 6.5%, p = 0.046). Recurrence of anaphylaxis was noticed in 43 sufferers (39.8%).
 |
Desk 1 Normal Traits of 108 Sufferers |
Triggers of Anaphylaxis
The triggers for 157 anaphylactic occasions are proven in Table 2 and Figure 2. Meals have been the most typical causative brokers (80.3%, 126/157), adopted by meals+train/train (14%, 22/157) and medicines (2.5%, 4/157). The triggers weren’t decided in 3.2% (5/157) of all reactions, which have been categorised as idiopathic. General, essentially the most often implicated meals have been fruits/greens (22.3%, 35/157), wheat (8.9%, 14/157), and milk (8.3%, 13/157). The most typical fruit set off was peach (n = 7), adopted by mango (n = 5) and pitaya (n = 5), and the most typical nuts set off was walnut (n = 4), adopted by almond (n = 2) and hazelnut (n = 2). There was no distinction within the set off profile between the mild-to-moderate and extreme anaphylaxis group.
 |
Desk 2 Triggers of 157 Anaphylactic Reactions |
 |
Determine 2 Triggers and meals triggers of 158 anaphylactic response. |
Among the many 157 anaphylactic reactions, 14% (22/157) occurred throughout train. Supplement Table 3 exhibits the detailed scientific traits of 16 sufferers who skilled anaphylaxis throughout train. The imply age on the response was 10.1 ± 3.56 years, vary (3–17 years); 63.6% (14/22) occurred in pollen season (10 episodes within the autumn, 4 episodes within the spring). A complete of 90.9% (20/22) of the episodes occurred throughout outside train (operating, n = 11; jogging, n = 3; enjoying basketball, n = 3; fast strolling, n = 2; enjoying golf, n = 1). When analyzing meals triggers earlier than train, meals triggers weren’t recorded within the chart (n = 11); combine meals (n = 3); wheat (n = 2); banana (n = 2); apple (n = 1), cherry (n = 1); pitaya (n = 1), cauliflower (n = 1); allergic comorbidities in 16 sufferers, included allergic rhinitis in 75% (12/16), bronchial asthma in 37.5% (6/16), meals allergy in 18.5% (3/16), and recurrent urticaria in 12.5% (2/16) of the sufferers.
Signs of Anaphylaxis
Supplement Table 2 summarizes the signs of anaphylaxis. Pores and skin and mucocutaneous signs have been essentially the most frequent (86.0%, 135/157), adopted by respiratory (73.9%, 116/157), gastrointestinal (21%, 33/157), oropharyngeal (15.9%, 25/157), neurological (6.4%, 10/157), and cardiovascular (8.9%, 14/157) signs. Thirty-eight reactions (22.8%,38/157) have been categorised as extreme anaphylaxis.
Acute Administration of Anaphylaxis
Table 3 exhibits the remedy of the 121 anaphylactic episodes. Acute administration was not accessible for 36 anaphylactic occasions. Among the many 121 anaphylactic occasions with detailed administration data, 9.9% (12/121) self-resolved and 38.8% (47/121) have been home-treated. A complete of 59.5% (72/121) of the anaphylactic occasions have been handled within the emergency division; 22.3% (27/121) obtained with glucocorticoids; and solely 7.4% (9/121) have been handled with epinephrine.
 |
Desk 3 Acute Administration of 121 Anaphylactic Reactions (Unrecorded N = 36) |
Dialogue
The findings of this examine revealed the traits of anaphylaxis in youngsters with pollen sensitization, which demonstrated completely different profiles from our not too long ago revealed age-dependent profiles of anaphylaxis in youngsters.2
The current examine confirmed that mugwort was the most typical offender. This can be as a result of virtually all youngsters in our cohort have been from northern China, and mugwort pollen is essentially the most allergenic pollen in late summer time and autumn in northern China.13,19,20 This discovering is in line with our beforehand revealed knowledge, the place we reported that mugwort sensitization was widespread in sufferers with particular food-induced anaphylaxis, particularly in fruit/greens (67%) and spices (75%).9 Moreover, in contrast with oropharyngeal signs, systemic reactions are the principle manifestation of mugwort pollen-related meals allergy in Chinese language inhabitants.2 Ragweed was the second most typical pollen sensitization in our examine. Ragweed is without doubt one of the main allergen sources inflicting allergy in North America and Europe.21 Nevertheless, it has unfold and has additionally turn into a significant issue in China. One examine summarized 215,210 checks with the ImmunoCAP system from 2008 to 2010, and prompt that ragweed sensitization charge in Chinese language inhabitants was 48%.20 Our examine confirmed that birch pollen sensitization was extra widespread in extreme anaphylaxis, we speculate was that almost all of sufferers (73%) with birch pollen allergy are prone to expertise pollen-related meals allergy,14 and thus there could also be a better danger of anaphylaxis episodes triggered by a meals allergen.
Primarily based on the current examine, recurrent urticaria was extra widespread in youngsters with extreme anaphylaxis. In response to the brand new grading system, allergic response is classed into 5 grades, from generalized urticaria, to hypotension, collapse, and lack of consciousness (ie, anaphylaxis).22 It has been reported that wheat-induced anaphylaxis may manifest as a gentle response, equivalent to urticaria and angioedema.23 Thus, recurrent urticaria and anaphylaxis could also be two completely different levels or phases of meals allergy. Extreme allergic reactions happen when probably exacerbating co-factors exist, equivalent to bodily exercise, use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicine, and alcohol consumption. Sure co-factors are nicely documented to irritate or precipitate wheat-induced anaphylaxis (WIA)/wheat-dependent train induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA).24 Therefore, the scientific development of recurrent urticaria could also be related for evaluating the danger of anaphylaxis amongst sufferers with pollen sensitization.
Meals have been confirmed to be essentially the most frequent set off for anaphylaxis within the present examine, which is in line with different research of anaphylaxis in youngsters.2 The most typical meals triggers have been fruits/greens, which is in accordance with our earlier examine that demonstrated that fruits/greens have been the most typical meals allergens in preschool-age youngsters (35.9%) and school-age youngsters (31.6%),2 and different revealed knowledge in China prompt that fruit/greens have been the most typical meals triggers in youngsters aged 4–9 years (59%).9 In distinction, comparatively decrease charges of fruits/vegetables-induced anaphylaxis have been reported in research from European nations. Alvarez-Perea et al25 reported that 7% of Spanish youngsters attending hospital for reported anaphylaxis had a confirmed allergy to fruits, and knowledge from the European Anaphylaxis Registry additionally present that fruits are answerable for 5% of all causes of anaphylaxis to meals in youngsters and adolescents.26 Fruits/vegetable-induced anaphylaxis might consequence from PFAS on account of cross-reactivity with a warmth secure pollen allergen part.27 Within the present cohort, the most typical fruit allergen inflicting anaphylaxis was peach, which is according to a earlier examine from China,15 and a nationwide survey performed in Korea that confirmed that peach was the highest pollen-related meals set off.11 However, kiwi is the highest fruit set off within the North America.7 Sensitization patterns of cross-reactive allergens are associated to pollen sensitization; thus, geographical distribution of pollen allergens and regional dietary habits affect plant-derived meals set off sensitization profiles and scientific signs. Extreme or anaphylactic reactions to vegetables and fruit usually tend to happen on account of lipid switch proteins (LTP), initially described solely in southern Mediterranean nations however extra not too long ago additionally acknowledged in Chinese language inhabitants the place it’s associated to sensitization to peach, tree nuts, peanuts, and likewise to pollens, equivalent to airplane tree and mugwort.8,15,28
Train was the most typical issue for aggravating or triggering anaphylaxis in our examine. This discovering is in line with that from a earlier examine on anaphylaxis in youngsters and youngsters in Europe.29 In our examine, about 64% of exercise-induced anaphylaxis occurred throughout pollen season, particularly within the autumn. In distinction, Gabrielli et al7 revealed that extreme anaphylactic reactions to fruits in a Canadian inhabitants have been extra prone to happen through the spring; the authors concluded that the elevated danger within the spring could also be associated to larger pollen counts that might sensitize the immune system and scale back the response threshold. Given these knowledge and the acknowledged cofactors of anaphylaxis, it will be worthwhile to advise sufferers with pollen allergy who’ve a recognized fruit/vegetable allergy to keep away from train in affiliation with meals consumption. Beforehand described food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) is a uncommon subtype of anaphylaxis occurring after publicity to an offending meals adopted by bodily exercise, whereas each the implicated meals and train, remoted, are tolerated independently.30 Our current examine confirmed that pollen-related fruits are the most typical meals triggers earlier than train, which can be as a result of cross-reactive allergen elements equivalent to LTP, that are thermostable and fewer inclined to enzymatic degradation on account of their compact, folded construction.31 As talked about above, allergic reactions to LTP are usually extra extreme.32 Furthermore, in accordance with Romano et al.33 LTPs have been essentially the most frequent main allergen (78%) in a bunch of Italian sufferers with FDEIA. Nevertheless, wheat is essentially the most generally reported allergen; because the best-studied subtype of FDEIA,34 not too long ago revealed knowledge have demonstrated that wheat anaphylaxis is extremely depending on the presence of co-factors (eg, train) and is much less often related to atopic illnesses in contrast with different meals allergic reactions.35 Sadly, though we speculated that the FDEIA instances in our examine could also be induced by LTPs, we didn’t conduct a part allergen take a look at.
The chance elements for extreme anaphylactic reactions in pollen sensitization people haven’t been reported so far. In our examine, sensitization to birch and recurrent urticaria have been extra widespread in sufferers with extreme anaphylaxis, indicating that these could also be danger elements for extreme reactions. A nationwide examine in South Korea demonstrated that the sensitization to particular pollen (hazel, timothy and ragweed) and the presence of atopic dermatitis (AD) have been the danger elements for anaphylaxis in PFAS.36 Moreover, the present examine indicated that train, particularly train throughout pollen season, was a co-factor or augmenting issue that triggered anaphylactic reactions dependently or independently of meals allergens. Thus, if pollinosis sufferers have pollen-related meals allergic reactions, sIgE constructive to birch and the presence of recurrent urticaria could also be associated to the event of extreme anaphylaxis, and different danger elements, equivalent to augmentation elements (pollen sensitization profile, train, pollen season, and atopy standing), might enhance the response severity.
On this cohort, there was under-use of epinephrine within the remedy, contemplating that solely 7.4% of the sufferers obtained epinephrine within the emergency division. The discovering is in line with beforehand revealed research in China,2,9,37 and the low use of epinephrine demonstrates the necessity for training selling the usage of epinephrine in all instances of anaphylaxis. Nevertheless, there’s controversy relating to the necessity to prescribe epinephrine to sufferers with PFAS as a result of it has been reported that solely a minority of PFAS progress to anaphylaxis.11 Though tips on epinephrine auto-injector (EAI) prescription stay controversial,28 we recommend that youngsters with a historical past of anaphylaxis needs to be prescribed EAI even when the prognosis is PFAS.
This examine had a number of limitations. The examine was carried out in a single middle in north China; therefore, our findings might not apply to the overall inhabitants of China. A significant limitation of the examine was the lack of knowledge about pores and skin prick testing or particular IgE measurements to fruit and vegetable allergens to help assumptions about pollen cross-reactivity, and as a result of limitation of allergen-specific IgE panel, in our cohort, sIgE stage of solely three widespread pollen (mugwort, ragweed and birch) have been quantified by Phadia system (immunoCAP) in our cohort. Moreover, the prognosis of anaphylaxis was established on the idea of reported info, somewhat than laboratory testing and problem checks.
Conclusion
Fruits/greens account for a considerable share of anaphylaxis instances in youngsters with pollen sensitization. Train is the most typical issue that aggravates or triggers anaphylaxis.
The suboptimal use of epinephrine highlights the necessity for academic packages selling the usage of epinephrine. As a result of extreme anaphylaxis to plant-derived meals may consequence from cross-reactivity to pollen, you will need to promote consciousness amongst mother and father and caregivers relating to this elevated danger in youngsters with pollen sensitization.
Abbreviations
FDEIA, food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis; LTP, lipid switch proteins; EAI, epinephrine auto-injector; PFAS, pollen-food allergy syndrome; IgE, immunoglobulin E.
Information Sharing Assertion
The info and supplies can be found from the corresponding authors primarily based on affordable requirement.
Ethics Approval and Knowledgeable Consent
This examine has been carried out in accordance with the rules said within the Declaration of Helsinki, and the examine protocol was authorized by the Analysis and Ethics Board of Beijing Kids’s Hospital. (Approval quantity:2022-E-023-R) As a result of this examine was primarily based on the retrospective evaluation of medical digital report, the knowledgeable consent was deemed exempt by the Analysis and Ethics Board.
Consent for Publication
All authors have authorized the manuscript and agree with its submission to the Journal of Bronchial asthma and Allergy.
Acknowledgments
We appreciated all of the sufferers and investigators who participated on this examine.
Funding
This examine was supported by Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme, (code: QML20201203), and Respiatory Analysis Venture of Nationwide Medical Analysis Middle for Respiratory Ailments (code. HXZX-20210203, HXZX-20210204, HXZX-202107).
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of curiosity on this work.
References
1. Cardona V, Ansotegui IJ, Ebisawa M, et al. World allergy group anaphylaxis steering 2020. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(10):100472. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472
2. Jiang N, Xu W, Xiang L. Age-related variations in traits of anaphylaxis in Chinese language youngsters from infancy to adolescence. World Allergy Organ J. 2021;14(11):100605. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100605
3. Lam HCY, Turner PJ, Hemming D, Jarvis DL. Seasonality of food-related anaphylaxis admissions and associations with temperature and pollen ranges. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(1):518–520.e512. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.032
4. Vetander M, Helander D, Flodström C, et al. Anaphylaxis and reactions to meals in youngsters–a population-based case examine of emergency division visits. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(4):568–577. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03954.x
5. Sicherer SH, Warren CM, Dant C, Gupta RS, Nadeau KC. Meals allergy from infancy by means of maturity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;8(6):1854–1864. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.010
6. Hayashi M, Pawankar R, Yamanishi S, Itoh Y. Meals-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis to soybean: gly m 5 and Gly m 6 as causative allergen elements. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(7):100439. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100439
7. Gabrielli S, Clarke AE, Morris J, et al. Fruit-induced anaphylaxis: scientific presentation and administration. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;9(7):2825–2830.e2822. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.055
8. Deng S, Yin J. Mugwort pollen-related meals allergy: lipid switch protein sensitization and correlation with the severity of allergic reactions in a Chinese language Inhabitants. Allergy Bronchial asthma Immunol Res. 2019;11(1):116–128. doi:10.4168/aair.2019.11.1.116
9. Jiang N, Yin J, Wen L, Li H. Traits of Anaphylaxis in 907 Chinese language sufferers referred to a tertiary allergy middle: a retrospective examine of 1952 episodes. Allergy Bronchial asthma Immunol Res. 2016;8(4):353–361. doi:10.4168/aair.2016.8.4.353
10. Egger M, Mutschlechner S, Wopfner N, et al. Pollen-food syndromes related to weed pollinosis: an replace from the molecular standpoint. Allergy. 2006;61(4):461–476. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.00994.x
11. Kim MA, Kim DK, Yang HJ, et al. Pollen-food allergy syndrome in Korean Pollinosis Sufferers: a Nationwide Survey. Allergy Bronchial asthma Immunol Res. 2018;10(6):648–661. doi:10.4168/aair.2018.10.6.648
12. Hao G-D, Zheng Y-W, Wang Z-X, et al. Excessive correlation of particular IgE sensitization between birch pollen, soy and apple allergens signifies pollen-food allergy syndrome amongst birch pollen allergic sufferers in northern China. J Zhejiang Univ. 2016;17(5):399–404. doi:10.1631/jzus.B1500279
13. Wang X-Y, Ma -T-T, Wang X-Y, et al. Prevalence of pollen-induced allergic rhinitis with excessive pollen publicity in grasslands of northern China. Allergy. 2018;73(6):1232–1243. doi:10.1111/all.13388
14. Biedermann T, Winther L, Until SJ, et al. Birch pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1237–1248. doi:10.1111/all.13758
15. Li J-D, Du Z-R, Liu J, et al. Traits of pollen-related meals allergy primarily based on particular person pollen allergy profiles within the Chinese language inhabitants. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(5):100120. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100120
16. Tolkki L, Alanko Ok, Petman L, et al. Medical characterization and IgE profiling of birch (Betula verrucosa)–allergic people affected by allergic reactions to uncooked vegetables and fruit. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;1(6):623–631.e621. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2013.07.010
17. Choi JH, Jang YS, Oh JW, Kim CH, Hyun IG. Bee pollen-induced anaphylaxis: a case report and literature assessment. Allergy Bronchial asthma Immunol Res. 2015;7(5):513–517. doi:10.4168/aair.2015.7.5.513
18. Muraro A, Roberts G, Clark A, et al. The administration of anaphylaxis in childhood: place paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Medical Immunology. Allergy. 2007;62(8):857–871. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01421.x
19. Tang R, Solar J-L, Yin J, Li Z. Artemisia allergy analysis in China. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:179426. doi:10.1155/2015/179426
20. Wrz H. Evaluation of 200 thousand outcomes of allergen particular IgE take a look at. Chin J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;6(1):18–23.
21. D’amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, et al. Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy. 2007;62(9):976–990. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01393.x
22. Dribin TE, Schnadower D, Spergel JM, et al. Severity grading system for acute allergic reactions: a multidisciplinary Delphi examine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(1):173–181. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.003
23. Xu YY, Jiang NN, Wen LP, Li H, Yin J. Wheat allergy in sufferers with recurrent urticaria. World Allergy Organ J. 2019;12(2):100013. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100013
24. Scherf KA, Brockow Ok, Biedermann T, Koehler P, Wieser H. Wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016;46(1):10–20. doi:10.1111/cea.12640
25. Alvarez-Perea A, Ameiro B, Morales C, et al. Anaphylaxis within the pediatric emergency division: evaluation of 133 instances after an allergy workup. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;5(5):1256–1263. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.011
26. Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, et al. Anaphylaxis in youngsters and adolescents: the European Anaphylaxis Registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1128–1137.e1121. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.11.015
27. Carlson G, Coop C. Pollen meals allergy syndrome (PFAS): a assessment of present obtainable literature. Ann Allergy Bronchial asthma Immunol. 2019;123(4):359–365. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2019.07.022
28. Katelaris CH. Ought to sufferers with pollen fruit syndrome be prescribed an automated epinephrine injector? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;16(4):370–374. doi:10.1097/aci.0000000000000278
29. Hompes S, Köhli A, Nemat Ok, et al. Scary allergens and remedy of anaphylaxis in youngsters and adolescents–knowledge from the anaphylaxis registry of German-speaking nations. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22(6):568–574. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01154.x
30. Feldweg AM. Meals-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis: prognosis and administration within the outpatient setting. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;5(2):283–288. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.022
31. Skypala IJ. Can sufferers with oral allergy syndrome be liable to anaphylaxis? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20(5):459–464. doi:10.1097/aci.0000000000000679
32. Skypala IJ. When diet and allergy collide: the rise of anaphylaxis to plant meals. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;17(5):338–343. doi:10.1097/aci.0000000000000387
33. Romano A, Scala E, Rumi G, et al. Lipid switch proteins: essentially the most frequent sensitizer in Italian topics with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(11):1643–1653. doi:10.1111/cea.12011
34. Wong GK, Krishna MT. Meals-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis: is wheat distinctive? Curr Allergy Bronchial asthma Rep. 2013;13(6):639–644. doi:10.1007/s11882-013-0388-2
35. Kraft M, Dölle-Bierke S, Renaudin J-M, et al. Wheat Anaphylaxis in adults differs from reactions to different sorts of meals. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;9(7):2844–2852.e2845. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.037
36. Kim M, Ahn Y, Yoo Y, et al. Medical manifestations and danger elements of anaphylaxis in pollen-food allergy syndrome. Yonsei Med J. 2019;60(10):960–968. doi:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.10.960
37. Jiang C, Li H, Wang L, Liu C, Hao X. Gaps between precise preliminary remedy of anaphylaxis in China and worldwide tips: a assessment and evaluation of 819 reported instances. Allergy. 2020;75(4):968–971. doi:10.1111/all.14090
