IPCC Particular Report on World Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
Anderson, C. M. et al. Pure local weather options will not be sufficient. Science 363, 933–934 (2019).
Carton, W., Lund, J. F. & Dooley, Okay. Undoing equivalence: rethinking carbon accounting for simply carbon removing. Entrance. Clim. 3, 30 (2021).
Seddon, N. et al. Getting the message proper on nature-based options to local weather change. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1518–1546 (2021).
Griscom, B. W. et al. We want each pure and vitality options to stabilize our local weather. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1889–1890 (2019).
Fargione, J. et al. Pure local weather options for the US. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat1869 (2018).
Drever, C. R. et al. Pure local weather options for Canada. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd6034 (2021).
Griscom, B. W. et al. Pure local weather options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
Fuss, S. et al. Unfavorable emissions—Half 2: prices, potentials and negative effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 63002 (2018).
Gregorio, N. et al. in Enhancing Meals Safety By means of Forest Panorama Restoration: Classes from Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines (eds Kumar, C. et al.) 174–217 (IUCN, 2015).
Meyer, J. M. Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and the boundaries of politics in American thought. Polity 30, 267–284 (1997).
Normal on Biodiversity Offsets (BBOP, 2012).
Efficiency Normal 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Administration of Pure Sources (IFC, 2012).
Arlidge, W. N. S. et al. A worldwide mitigation hierarchy for nature conservation. Bioscience 68, 336–347 (2018).
Science-Primarily based Targets for Nature: Preliminary Steering for Enterprise (Science Primarily based Targets Community, 2020).
Seddon, N. et al. Understanding the worth and limits of nature-based options to local weather change and different world challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190120 (2020).
Ellis, P. W. et al. Lowered-impact logging for local weather change mitigation (RIL-C) can halve selective logging emissions from tropical forests. Ecol. Manag. 438, 255–266 (2019).
Martin, D. M. Ecological restoration ought to be redefined for the twenty-first century. Restor. Ecol. 25, 668–673 (2017).
Veldman, J. W. et al. The place tree planting and forest enlargement are unhealthy for biodiversity and ecosystem providers. Bioscience 65, 1011–1018 (2015).
Supporting Canadians and Preventing COVID-19 (Division of Finance Canada, 2020).
Roe, S. et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 °C world. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 817–828 (2019).
Seddon, N. et al. Nature-Primarily based Options in Nationally Decided Contributions: Synthesis and Suggestions for Enhancing Local weather Ambition and Motion by 2020 (IUCN, 2019).
Carbon Removing Company Motion Tracker (Institute for Carbon Removing Regulation and Coverage, accessed 6 July 2021); https://research.american.edu/carbonremoval/2020/05/07/carbon-removal-corporate-action-tracker/
Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry commerce drives giant share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Aim 1 Evaluation: Striving to Finish Pure Forest Loss (NYDF Progress Evaluation Secretariat, 2020).
Smith, B. One 12 months later: The trail to carbon adverse—a progress report on our local weather ‘moonshot’. Microsoft Weblog (28 January 2021); https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2021/01/28/one-year-later-the-path-to-carbon-negative-a-progress-report-on-our-climate-moonshot/
Ward, C. et al. Smallholder perceptions of land restoration actions: rewetting tropical peatland oil palm areas in Sumatra. Indonesia. Reg. Environ. Change 21, 1 (2020).
Jacobson, M. & Ham, C. The (un)damaged promise of agroforestry: a case examine of improved fallows in Zambia. Environ. Dev. Maintain. 22, 8247–8260 (2020).
West, T. A. P., Börner, J., Sills, E. O. & Kontoleon, A. Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ tasks within the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 117, 24188–24194 (2020).
Prepare dinner-Patton, S. C. et al. Decrease value and extra possible choices to revive forest cowl within the contiguous United States for local weather mitigation. One Earth 3, 739–752 (2020).
Petersen, S. O., Højberg, O., Poulsen, M., Schwab, C. & Eriksen, J. Methanogenic neighborhood adjustments, and emissions of methane and different gases, throughout storage of acidified and untreated pig slurry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 117, 160–172 (2014).
Günther, A. et al. Immediate rewetting of drained peatlands reduces local weather warming regardless of methane emissions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1644 (2020).
Qin, Z. et al. Delayed impression of pure local weather options. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 215–217 (2021).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Local weather-driven dangers to the local weather mitigation potential of forests. Science 368, eaaz7005 (2020).
Pagiola, S., Honey-Rosés, J. & Freire-González, J. Assessing the permanence of land-use change induced by funds for environmental providers: proof from Nicaragua. Trop. Conserv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920922676 (2020).
Tseng, T.-W. J. et al. Affect of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes. Nat. Maintain. 4, 242–251 (2021).
Smith, P. et al. Impacts of land-based greenhouse fuel removing choices on ecosystem providers and the United Nations Sustainable Growth Objectives. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44, 255–286 (2019).
Nunez, S., Verboom, J. & Alkemade, R. Assessing land-based mitigation implications for biodiversity. Environ. Sci. Coverage 106, 68–76 (2020).
Chausson, A. et al. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based options for local weather change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6134–6155 (2020).
Infield, M., Entwistle, A., Anthem, H., Mugisha, A. & Phillips, Okay. Reflections on cultural values approaches to conservation: classes from 20 years of implementation. Oryx 52, 220–230 (2018).
Rosenstock, T. S. et al. A planetary well being perspective on agroforestry in sub-Saharan Africa. One Earth 1, 330–344 (2019).
Garrett, H. E. et al. Hardwood silvopasture administration in North America. Agrofor. Syst. 61, 21–33 (2004).
Kroeger, T. et al. Returns on funding in watershed conservation: utility of a finest practices analytical framework to the Rio Camboriú Water Producer program, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Sci. Complete Environ. 657, 1368–1381 (2019).
Lamb, D., Erskine, P. D. & Parrotta, J. A. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310, 1628–1632 (2005).
Ferreira, J. et al. Carbon-focused conservation might fail to guard essentially the most biodiverse tropical forests. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 744–749 (2018).
Prepare dinner-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from world pure forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).
Wilson, S. J., Schelhas, J., Grau, R., Nanni, A. S. & Sloan, S. Forest ecosystem-service transitions: the ecological dimensions of the forest transition. Ecol. Soc. 22, 38 (2017).
Funk, J. M. et al. Securing the local weather advantages of secure forests. Clim. Coverage 19, 845–860 (2019).
Keith, H. et al. Evaluating nature-based options for local weather mitigation and conservation requires complete carbon accounting. Sci. Complete Environ. 769, 144341 (2021).
Moomaw, W. R., Masino, S. A. & Faison, E. Okay. Intact forests in the US: proforestation mitigates local weather change and serves the best good. Entrance. For. Glob. Change 2, 27 (2019).
Hiraishi, T. et al. 2013 Complement to the 2006 IPCC Tips for Nationwide Greenhouse Gasoline Inventories: Wetlands (WMO, 2013).
Goldstein, A. et al. Defending irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 287–295 (2020).
Griscom, B. W. et al. Nationwide mitigation potential from pure local weather options within the tropics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190126 (2020).
Busch, J. et al. Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removing by way of tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 463–466 (2019).
Vargas Zeppetello, L. R. et al. Massive scale tropical deforestation drives excessive warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 84012 (2020).
Spalding, M. D. et al. The position of ecosystems in coastal safety: adapting to local weather change and coastal hazards. Ocean Coast. Manag. 90, 50–57 (2014).
Watson, J. E. M. et al. The distinctive worth of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).
World Evaluation Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Providers (IPBES, 2019).
Dobson, A. P. et al. Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention. Science 369, 379–381 (2020).
Streck, C. REDD+ and leakage: debunking myths and selling built-in options. Clim. Coverage 21, 843–852 (2021).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. The price of restoring carbon shares in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 830–841 (2021).
Bustamante-Sánchez, M. A. & Armesto, J. J. Seed limitation throughout early forest succession in a rural panorama on Chiloé Island, Chile: implications for temperate forest restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1103–1112 (2012).
Koch, A., Brierley, C. & Lewis, S. L. Results of Earth system feedbacks on the potential mitigation of large-scale tropical forest restoration. Biogeosciences 18, 2627–2647 (2021).
Zickfeld, Okay., Azevedo, D., Mathesius, S. & Matthews, H. D. Asymmetry within the local weather–carbon cycle response to optimistic and adverse CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 613–617 (2021).
Johnson, Okay. A. et al. A profit–value evaluation of floodplain land acquisition for US flood injury discount. Nat. Maintain. 3, 56–62 (2020).
Nolte, C. Excessive-resolution land worth maps reveal underestimation of conservation prices in the US. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 29577–29583 (2020).
Reetz, H., Heffer, P. & Bruulsema, T. in Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification (eds Drechsel, P. et al.) 65–86 (IFA, IWMI, IPNI and IPI, 2015).
Sharma, P. et al. The position of canopy crops in direction of sustainable soil well being and agriculture—a overview paper. Am. J. Plant Sci. 09, 1935–1951 (2018).
Bergeron, M. et al. Lowered soil nutrient leaching following the institution of tree-based intercropping techniques in japanese Canada. Agrofor. Syst. 83, 321–330 (2011).
Moore, A. A. & Palmer, M. A. Invertebrate biodiveristy in agricultural and concrete headwater streams: implications for conservation and administration. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1169–1177 (2005).
Martin, M. P. et al. Folks plant timber for utility extra usually than for biodiversity or carbon. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109224 (2021).
Mendes, T. P., de Assis Montag, L. F., Alvarado, S. T. & Juen, L. Assessing habitat high quality on alpha and beta range of Odonata larvae (Insect) in logging areas in Amazon forest. Hydrobiologia 848, 1147–1161 (2021).
Crouzeilles, R. et al. Attaining cost-effective landscape-scale forest restoration by way of focused pure regeneration. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12709 (2020).
Gilroy, J. J. et al. Low cost carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 503–507 (2014).
Riahi, Okay. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their vitality, land use, and greenhouse fuel emissions implications: an outline. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation positive aspects and halve prices. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).
Taillardat, P., Thompson, B. S., Garneau, M., Trottier, Okay. & Friess, D. A. Local weather change mitigation potential of wetlands and the cost-effectiveness of their restoration. Interface Focus 10, 20190129 (2020).
Xu, S., Liu, X., Li, X. & Tian, C. Soil natural carbon adjustments following wetland restoration: a world meta-analysis. Geoderma 353, 89–96 (2019).
Holl, Okay. D. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Tree planting is just not a easy resolution. Science 368, 580–581 (2020).
Kroeger, T., McDonald, R. I., Boucher, T., Zhang, P. & Wang, L. The place the individuals are: present traits and future potential focused investments in city timber for PM10 and temperature mitigation in 27 U.S. cities. Landsc. City Plan. 177, 277–240 (2018).
McDonald, R. I., Kroeger, T., Zhang, P. & Hamel, P. The worth of US city tree cowl for lowering heat-related well being impacts and electrical energy consumption. Ecosystems 23, 137–150 (2020).
Heris, M. et al. Piloting city ecosystem accounting for the US. Ecosyst. Serv. 48, 101226 (2021).
Ellison, D. et al. Bushes, forests and water: cool insights for a scorching world. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 51–61 (2017).
Li, R. et al. Time and house meet up with restoration packages that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8650 (2021).
Gaveau, D. L. A. et al. Rise and fall of forest loss and industrial plantations in Borneo (2000–2017). Conserv. Lett. 12, e12622 (2019).
Griscom, B. W., Goodman, R. C., Burivalova, Z. & Putz, F. E. Carbon and biodiversity impacts of intensive versus in depth tropical forestry. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12362 (2018).
Gabon’s Proposed Nationwide RED+ Forest Reference Degree (Gabonese Republic, 2021).
Umunay, P., Gregoire, T., Gopalakrishna, T., Ellis, P. & Putz, F. Selective logging emissions and potential emission reductions from reduced-impact logging within the Congo Basin. Ecol. Manag. 437, 360–371 (2019).
Pure Local weather Options World Atlas (Nature4Climate, accessed 9 December 2020); https://nature4climate.org/n4c-mapper/
Dave, R. et al. Second Bonn Problem Progress Report: Software of the Barometer in 2018 (IUCN, 2019); https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.06.en
Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and folks. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).
Seymour, F. Seeing the forests in addition to the (trillion) timber in company local weather methods. One Earth 2, 390–393 (2020).
Kronenberg, J. & Mieszkowicz, J. Planting timber for publicity—how a lot are they value? Sustainability 3, 1022–1034 (2011).
Microsoft Carbon Removing: Classes from an Early Company Buy (Microsoft, 2021).
Toor, I. A., Smith, E. G., Whalen, J. Okay. & Naseem, A. Tree-based intercropping in southern Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 60, 141–154 (2012).
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The efficiency and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets below “no internet loss” insurance policies: a world overview. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).
Adoption of the Paris Settlement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).